Comments on: Benchmarking fun with JRuby 1.1 RC2, glassfish, and Rails 2.0.2 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/ I really do... Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:37:22 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Manuel http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-92 Manuel Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:14:24 +0000 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-92 For those who want to try JRuby themselves there is a multi-platform easy to use installed called JRubyStack. I comes with JRuby, Rails, Java, Tomcat, GlassFish gem, MySQL and Subversion. You can find it here: http://bitnami.org/stack/jrubystack For those who want to try JRuby themselves there is a multi-platform easy to use installed called JRubyStack. I comes with JRuby, Rails, Java, Tomcat, GlassFish gem, MySQL and Subversion.

You can find it here:
http://bitnami.org/stack/jrubystack

]]> By: Lorenzo E. Danielsson http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-88 Lorenzo E. Danielsson Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:19:28 +0000 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-88 @Christian Seiler: I thought there were issues with JDK6 and Leopard, or? @Christian Seiler: I thought there were issues with JDK6 and Leopard, or?

]]> By: Christian Seiler http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-87 Christian Seiler Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:45:00 +0000 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-87 You should try with JDK6. It's significantly faster. You should try with JDK6. It’s significantly faster.

]]> By: Interesting Ruby Tidbits That Don’t Need Separate Posts #17 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-86 Interesting Ruby Tidbits That Don’t Need Separate Posts #17 Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:10:33 +0000 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-86 [...] exceeds that of Ruby 1.8.6 and even Ruby 1.9 in places. Meanwhile, other developers have been doing [...] [...] exceeds that of Ruby 1.8.6 and even Ruby 1.9 in places. Meanwhile, other developers have been doing [...]

]]> By: Rich http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-85 Rich Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:26:24 +0000 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-85 Great write up. I posted my numbers after I saw yours... http://oracleappslab.com/2008/02/17/mix-presidents-day-release-jruby-11rc2-and-a-bunch-of-other-stuff/ Great write up. I posted my numbers after I saw yours… http://oracleappslab.com/2008/02/17/mix-presidents-day-release-jruby-11rc2-and-a-bunch-of-other-stuff/

]]> By: Clinton Begin http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-84 Clinton Begin Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:25 +0000 http://blog.erichsen.net/2008/02/17/benchmarking-fun-with-jruby-11-rc2-glassfish-and-rails-202/#comment-84 Did you watch the memory footprint of each deployment? How did they compare? These days with cheap VPS hosting starting at 256MB, I'm more interested in being able to run in 256MB than I am in subtle differences in CPU cycles. :-) Did you watch the memory footprint of each deployment? How did they compare? These days with cheap VPS hosting starting at 256MB, I’m more interested in being able to run in 256MB than I am in subtle differences in CPU cycles. :-)

]]>